[Twisted-Python] Questions about Project Leadership committee

[Glyph]

> On Jan 24, 2021, at 1:24 AM, Adi Roiban <adi at roiban.ro> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 04:29, Glyph <glyph at twistedmatrix.com <mailto:glyph at twistedmatrix.com>> wrote:
> 
> On January 23, 2021 at 6:10:04 PM, Craig Rodrigues (rodrigc at crodrigues.org <mailto:rodrigc at crodrigues.org>) wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 4:54 PM Glyph <glyph at twistedmatrix.com <mailto:glyph at twistedmatrix.com>> wrote:
>> At the time the committee was created, I don’t remember if this was public, so I don’t feel comfortable sharing identities publicly because it wasn’t part of the deal at the time. This is not the way I’d structure things now, but given that several members are unresponsive and don’t seem to want to be associated with the project any more, I can’t ask them if it’s OK with them. If you can find any old public documentation feel free to share though; the issue is that I’m not sure it *has* been public. If it has, it can by all means remain public.
>> 
>> I can at least share that as I recall there are 6 members and I’m one of them. But you’d want to confirm this with the conservancy, so please join Adi’s private thread with them for further discussion.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>> Have you recently contacted the 5 other committee members to confirm if they want to remain on the committee or not,
>> and either received confirmation (or feedback timeout)?
> Not recently although I’ve reached out several times in the past. I have no plans to reach out again until someone has worked out with the SFC what our options are and proposed a concrete plan.
> 
> I was in contact with SFC over IRC.
> 
> The first thing that someone need to do is send a message to twisted at sfconservancy.org <mailto:twisted at sfconservancy.org>
> Only after no response is received in time (I don't know how long that is...maybe 3 weeks) we can contact SFC and they
> will allocate extra resources to help solve this issue.
> 
> I have not sent a message to that list.
> For now, I don't plan to do it.
> I feel there is no consensus across the current active Twisted developers.
> 
> I encourage anyone else who wants to do it, to send the message to twisted at sfconservancy.org <mailto:twisted at sfconservancy.org>
> 
> Good luck

Thanks for the update, Adi; I appreciate your taking the initiative on this.

If we want to have a private deliberation among committers about next steps, I believe https://github.com/orgs/twisted/teams/twisted-contributors/discussions <https://github.com/orgs/twisted/teams/twisted-contributors/discussions> makes it possible to do that, so that might be a tool to use.

(To be clear, I think any conclusions from this discussions need to be made public and transparent, but for reasons previously mentioned in this conversation, we may want to be able to share ideas less publicly before we pick one to avoid muddling things like future bidding on work.)

-g

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/twisted-python/attachments/20210124/75803685/attachment.htm>