[Twisted-web] Re: [Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] r15860 -
Move checkPreconditions() from web2.dav.static.DAVFile to
James Y Knight
foom at fuhm.net
Thu Feb 9 11:45:14 MST 2006
Sorry, I meant to send this to twisted-web instead. Plz make any
reply there, instead.
On Feb 9, 2006, at 1:34 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
>> Move checkPreconditions() from web2.dav.static.DAVFile to
>> Add test suite (ported foom's tests for server.checkpreconditions()).
>> Fix some bugs found by the tests. (Holy cow, checkpreconditions
>> are a PITA.)
> I don't like this part. You've made the precondition check code
> much longer, IMO harder to understand (figuring out how the return
> values of one method influenced the rest of the execution is not
> easy), and pinned it to being part of Resource, rather than being
> reusable. I'm not sure of the need, given that the previous
> implementation was callable from Resource as it was. Why not just
> use it...
> Nextly, I'm somewhat concerned about the change to calling the
> precondition check before GET rendering instead of afterwards: I
> think your use cases are probably not typical. I believe most
> people will write resources which generate dynamic content, and if
> they're _really good_ about it, they'll simultaneously generate an
> etag and a last-modified time. This is also the only way that such
> information can come out of wsgi, cgi, proxies to other servers, etc.
> The way things were set up before made Not Modified responses just
> "magically" show up correctly when you set those headers in your
> response. No more interface was required than that, which means
> that the response could come from anywhere. Now, instead, you force
> the author to implement resource.etag() and resource.lastModified()
> in order to get that behavior. It's really easy for file-like
> resources to do so, but not so much so for most other kinds.
> And the thing is, it's OK to check afterwards for the kinds of
> requests a web browser makes: GET/HEAD/POST. GET/HEAD don't change
> things so it's acceptable to do their check at any time, and while
> POST does change things, as a practical matter nobody actually
> sends conditionals on post requests, because what would it be
> useful for? (and nothing would be set up to handle such a thing).
> However, I'm currently ignoring conditionals on PostableResource's
> http_POST, which while okay as far as real-world interoperability
> goes, it is certainly not _right_. And to make things worse, the
> post-processing filter doesn't confine itself to checking only GET/
> HEAD requests, so the client will get back a precondition failed
> message, even though the method was executed. At the very least a
> POST with an If-Unmodified-Since/If-Match should return
> precondition failed. If there was code on Resource to handle that
> automatically, I could not have forgetten to do it.
> So, um, I dunno what to conclude. :)
> Twisted-Python mailing list
> Twisted-Python at twistedmatrix.com
More information about the Twisted-web