Branch based development (Was Re: [Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] r16287 - Revert r16241; tests are passing.)

Jean-Paul Calderone exarkun at
Tue Mar 14 11:31:19 EST 2006

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:14:18 -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun at> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:33:30 -0700, Wilfredo Sanchez 
><wsanchez at> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>Revert r16241; tests are passing.
>This does not actually appear to be the case.

Okay, after a couple hours of trying to track down the problem here, I noticed that you fixed this bug with the very next commit.  This has caused me to realize that I don't think use of branches for all development on Twisted should be optional.

Unless anyone can present a compelling case to the contrary, I think that as of now we should "officially" switch to the development procedures described by <>.


More information about the Twisted-Python mailing list