[Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] r14922 - Fix to replace a lambda with something that's safe in the scope when it's
matt at pollenation.net
Thu Oct 27 10:27:36 EDT 2005
Matt Goodall wrote:
> Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
>>On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:45:59 -0600, Matt Goodall
>><mg at wolfwood.twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>>>Date: Thu Oct 27 03:45:58 2005
>>>New Revision: 14922
>>>Fix to replace a lambda with something that's safe in the scope when it's
>>>actually executed .... just in case anyone else is actually using this
>>Note that this changes the behavior from constructing Failure instances
>>in the reactor thread to creating them in a worker thread.
> Yes, very true. Thanks for raising it. Does it matter in this case?
> All the the args passed to Failure are worked out in the thread and I
> think that means Failure's __init__ does basically nothing. Did I miss
Also, I think it's now pointless digging the exception information out
of Python to pass to the Failure.__init__. That's what Failure will
*now* do on its own when passed nothing.
/ \__ Matt Goodall, Pollenation Internet Ltd
\__/ \ w: http://www.pollenation.net
__/ \__/ e: matt at pollenation.net
/ \__/ \ t: +44 (0)113 2252500
/ \ Any views expressed are my own and do not necessarily
\__/ reflect the views of my employer.
More information about the Twisted-Python