[Twisted-Python] Changing procmon.ProcessMonitor.processes

ex vito ex.vitorino at gmail.com
Wed Sep 20 02:32:21 MDT 2017


On 2017-09-19, at 15:49, Moshe Zadka <zadka.moshe at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:51 AM ex vito <ex.vitorino at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
> Other than that, again, per that section's rules, not being a commiter myself, I'm in no position to approve such a change. I wonder, however, how "urgent" such a final change is to you and why a deprecation cycle does not fit your purpose (even though, admittedly, it may represent more effort).
> 
> I think that between the low likelihood that someone went crawling over the attributes manually, the RoI of having a deprecation cycle with some intermediate solution that later needs to be cleaned up, and the fact that this would be a clean break (i.e., "AttributeError") rather than some obscure error, I am at least interested in opinions about going the exception route.
> 
> ProcMon is non-trivial to product ionize, and I'm not aware of anyone even using it in production, other than me, let alone crawling over its internal state.


Agreed. For completeness, the code I work with does not make use of ProcMon and I don't recall having ever used it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/twisted-python/attachments/20170920/02e0e8c7/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Twisted-Python mailing list