[Twisted-Python] Twisted is now under the MIT license.
serj_trejo at hotmail.com
Wed Aug 25 21:55:45 MDT 2004
I am curious as to how Australians view U.S.-centric IPR issues such as
licenses (e.g., GPL/LGPL) and patents. I read yesterday on Slashdot (and
would need to confirm this yet) that Microsoft has filed some ungodly amount
of U.S. patents (I think 5,000). The IPR patent issue is a sticky one lately
in Europe and I'm curious about Australia / New Zealand viewpoints.
>From: Mary Gardiner <mary-twisted at puzzling.org>
>Reply-To: Twisted general discussion <twisted-python at twistedmatrix.com>
>To: twisted-python at twistedmatrix.com
>Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted is now under the MIT license.
>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:50:01 +0000
>On Wed, Aug 25, 2004, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> > To be clear on this: contributions are now *only* copyright their
> > authors, (rather than the previous joint copyright-assignment to
> > glyph)? And so when you say "copyright holders", you're referring to
> > everyone that has copyright in any part of Twisted's source, rather
> > than saying that everyone is now joint holders of copyright?
>This was more or less my question too. Given that I got "this is how
>lots of open source projects do it!" as a response, I'm going to assume
>the former, because the latter doesn't seem that common.
>Twisted-Python mailing list
>Twisted-Python at twistedmatrix.com
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
More information about the Twisted-Python