[Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] Document the likley consequence of non running of unit tests
Bruce Mitchener
bruce at cubik.org
Mon Sep 23 21:28:29 EDT 2002
Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:12:51 -0600, Bruce Mitchener <bruce at cubik.org>
> wrote:
>>It'd be nice to see some further constructive discussion of this.
>>We'll also need to update the coding standard to reflect the usage
>>of epydoc rather than HappyDoc as well. There are probably other
>>updates that could and should be made as well.
I thought that I answered that in that same email or one of the others
today. :) http://epydoc.sf.net/
> I agree. Where is epydoc's pseudo-structured-text format documented?
> Does the existing pipe-prefix convention for inline code samples still
> work?
I _think_ that right now it just triggers a literal block which gets
rendered to HTML as a <pre class="literalblock">...</pre>
It'd be nice if that supported pretty-printing the source and all that,
but right now, there's no guarantee that it is Python source. (Like when
I got and put a quick HTML snippet in there, or SQL, or ...)
Patches for improving this are likely appreciated.
- Bruce
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list