#3997 enhancement new
Replace getProcess* helpers with a single, better, API.
|Reported by:||spiv||Owned by:|
|Cc:||khorn, Tom Prince||Branch:|
I think the subprocess module has the right idea: give you a single good way to start a function, and declare whether you want to capture/discard/ignore the various stdio streams etc, and then return an object with useful attributes.
So I propose that instead of
getProcessOutputAndValue (did I miss any?) we have a single method, that takes args like:
and returns a Deferred that yields an object with a
.exitValue attribute, and perhaps others (for finding out if a signal terminated it, maybe?). Returning an object certainly seems like a much better API than e.g. the tuples from
getProcessOutputAndValue. Obviously this new function would need a better name than
Probably any new API here should try to address the problems with the existing APIs described by exarkun in a comment at http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/280.
Quite possibly the proposal in this vague sketch could be improved even further. Please feel free to criticise, suggest improvements, suggest more precise details for the signature, etc. I figured it was better to capture a rough idea than forget it entirely.