wilk-ml at flibuste.net
Thu Sep 16 02:20:29 MDT 2004
Donovan Preston <dp at ulaluma.com> writes:
> On Sep 15, 2004, at 12:26 PM, William Dode wrote:
>> James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> writes:
>>> 3) For distribution: twisted.web2 depends on Nevow (for static
>>> directory listings, and error pages), so will be distributed with
>>> it. Nevow recommends Twisted but does not require it for simple cases
>>> (e.g. flattening to a string from a CGI script), so there can also be
>>> a limited-functionality distribution of standalone Nevow.
>> What about the wsgi spec ?
>> It could be great if the server could not depend on any framework (i
>> mean nevow).
> The server would depend on Nevow in order to generate the HTML for
> various automatically generated pages, such as directory listings. I
> suggested to James that having a standalone twisted.web server that
> didn't depend on Nevow and wasn't capable of generating any pages
> itself would be possible, but James didn't think it was worth the
I thought that the current spliting plan was interesting to can release
the differents parts independantly. I imagine that twisted.web2 will not
move so much than nevow and it's important to don't update a server when
we don't need.
I hope we'll also find a solution for the wsgi spec, goto the web-sig
William - http://flibuste.net
More information about the Twisted-web