[Twisted-web] Unwinding the Twisted Web (a progress report)
radix at twistedmatrix.com
Thu Apr 22 17:27:07 MDT 2004
James Y Knight wrote:
> So a few things:
> - I think we should dump woven.
We never deprecated it :-(
> - What is our compatibility story with old twisted-web? Now is a good
> time to make a break, so I think it should be done. By that I mean,
> new-twisted-web would not guarantee 100% backwards compatibleness with
> the old API. If you want 100% old API, use the old code. Wrappers
> *should* be provided for some normally called methods on
> Resource/Request such that much of people's old code will work, if it's
> doing normal resourcish stuff and not trying to be tricksy.
> - So, should a final release of OldTwistedWeb be done so people can keep
> updating to newer versions of twisted core and leave old twisted web alone?
I think we should just put all backwards-compatibility code into
twisted.web. So twisted.web will be API-compatible, and all of our BC
code will live in Twisted. It will still require tmlabs.web (or
whatever), and just wrap its APIs.
Twisted | Christopher Armstrong: International Man of Twistery
Radix | Release Manager, Twisted Project
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://pyramid.twistedmatrix.com/pipermail/twisted-web/attachments/20040422/59560503/signature.bin
More information about the Twisted-web