<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jul 2, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Michael Thompson wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 1 July 2011 18:38, Glyph Lefkowitz <<a href="mailto:glyph@twistedmatrix.com">glyph@twistedmatrix.com</a>> wrote:<font class="Apple-style-span" color="#07731d"><br></font></div></blockquote><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>I think github means less effort for the reviewer because they can<br>review commits, rather than a large diff. They can review changes<br>following a review.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>I already review diffs this way, with a local bzr-svn branch using 'bzr merge; bzr qlog'. Better yet I just sometimes do this on a plane :).</div><div><br></div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>They can have a tool to make comments next to the code and it is less effort to apply patches and update branches to HEAD.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This would be nice. Is it easy for the reviewee to look at all the comments in an ordered list?</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>