[Twisted-Python] Proposal -- Code of Conduct
Kevin Turner
keturn at keturn.net
Wed Jun 24 14:25:02 MDT 2015
I'm generally +1 on the idea of having a CoC.
I'm content to delegate the details to subcommittee, so maybe I should
leave it at that, but I find there's one point I want to reinforce here:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015, at 08:46 AM, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> 4. A CoC has several purposes, and "banning people" is actually pretty
> far down the list. […]
Agreed. Clayton said "They rarely get read until there's a problem," but
I think prevention and expectation-setting are things to aim for here.
If people only find out about what's acceptable conduct *after* there's
a problem, that's too late.
and as an aside,
> I think it's a problem that we don't have the names of the people on
> the PLC on our wiki, but this is a separate issue. [It should be
> rectified, as well as clarifying the rules for how the PLC
> acquires/retires members.
Agreed. (I am one of the current PLC members.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/twisted-python/attachments/20150624/6db1569d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list