[Twisted-Python] Names DNS Client too chatty

[Jason J. W. Williams]

If there's no objections the rest of today, I'll make sure the 4021
patch still applies and see what could be done as a test.

-J

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 02:43 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>>
>> Personally I'd say 'false'.  This is technically a change in
>> behavior, but I don't think that we should make guarantees about
>> emitted log messages.  Practically speaking, I've never seen any code
>> which would care about an unstructured log message.  Anyone else
>> object to changing it?
>
> I'm strongly in favour of setting noisy to False on all factory objects;
> I find their logging tedious, and have a bunch of monkeypatch code in
> most of my projects to import the modules and set the class variable, to
> I don't have to subclass just to do that.
>
> The structured logging proposal sounds interesting and I'm potentially
> willing to give it a go. However, it seems like it would be a lot of
> work and that it would be very likely to sit in Trac review limbo for a
> while (getting ever-harder to merge the branch back in).
>
> (This is not intended as a criticism - merely an observation that even
> tickets for simple problems with patches take a while to get reviewed,
> as manpower is of course a precious and scarce resource)
>
> Do you have any thoughts on how it could be broken down into smaller chunks?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Twisted-Python mailing list
> Twisted-Python at twistedmatrix.com
> http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
>