[Twisted-Python] multiprocessing capability?
K. Richard Pixley
rich at noir.com
Wed Feb 24 15:04:31 EST 2010
Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Alexandre Quessy wrote
>> Hello everyone,
>> I have done something similar to this, but I used the children IO
>> stream to control them. Maybe I should have done that using some
>> higher level protocol, such as AMP or PB.
> Using a higher-level protocol is generally better, if for no other reason that it gives you a framework within which to document your design decisions. It's much easier to say "An AMP command with a 'foo' String argument and a 'bar' Integer argument" than to say "The first two bytes of the message are the length of the first argument. The next n bytes are the first argument. The first argument shall be interpreted as... (etc, etc)"
I'm working on an interface right now to the spread toolkit,
(http://spread.org), which implements virtual synchrony,
For distributed, symmetric, fault tolerant parallelism in small to
medium scale with high reliability, this might be an option.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Twisted-Python