[Twisted-Python] Re: Event notification and general RPC in Twisted...
blair.bethwaite at gmail.com
Wed Nov 5 01:18:28 EST 2008
David, thanks for your response, it's great when people take the time
to read a lengthy question and then respond with some insight!
David Ripton wrote:
> PB allows both ends of the connection to send and receive at any time,
> over a single connection. I use it for a game where multiple clients
> connect via TCP to a server, and then the clients send messages to the
> server whenever they want, and the server sends messages to one or more
> clients whenever it wants (over the original connections initiated by
> the clients, so the clients don't need to open any holes in their
> firewalls), and everything just stinking works.
I ended up sort of answering this one for myself by just playing with
a basic chat server example and sniffing packets - only saw
SYN,SYN-ACK,ACK once for each client. Though it would be nice if the
documentation gave this level of detail, presumably this is something
that belongs with the different transports.
> That's not the way XML-RPC is typically done. Clearly you could make a
> protocol that uses XML-RPC payload over a persistent connection. But
> you'd lose the ability to use arbitrary XML-RPC libraries unmodified,
> which is probably the main benefit of choosing XML-RPC.
Duh, good point! Guess I was kinda trying to map our requirements onto
an example that looked easy (from the book).
> If not for the Java requirement, I would say that Twisted is a good fit,
> and that you could use either PB or AMP, depending on whether you want
> to pass around complex types or simple ones. But if you need Java,
> I don't know.
Guess I'll have to take a closer look at the Java implementation. Not
sure why I didn't stumble across AMP before but looks promising...
In science one tries to tell people, in such a way
as to be understood by everyone, something that
no one ever knew before. But in poetry, it's the
- Paul Dirac
More information about the Twisted-Python