[Twisted-Python] CPU choice for big twisted server.
glyph at divmod.com
glyph at divmod.com
Wed Mar 14 04:22:57 EDT 2007
On 01:51 am, matusis at matusis.com wrote:
>I am running a poll reactor with Twisted 2.2 on 2.6.11 kernel.
>"top" currently shows 80-90% CPU utilization for this twistd process.
>We have not switched to epoll Twisted 2.5 yet, although we are planning
Hi, Alec! Nice to hear that you're using Twisted in such a demanding
>Where should we expect a better performance: on Woodcrest 5140 with
>L2 or on Opteron 2216 with faster RAM access? We need to order the new
>tomorrow afternoon, so if someone could reply today, it'd be great for
I'm only replying to this message because of your extremely short
timeframe. I have _no_ reliable data that I would feel comfortable
making a decision based on, but then, either of these systems will
likely be adequate to your purposes. So, take all this with a grain of
salt, and I hope you get something better.
My new MacBook - a core 2 duo with 4MB of cache - slightly (10% time
difference) outstrips my desktop work machine - an opteron64 with 1MB of
cache - when running the Twisted unit tests. The Opteron is almost 8
months old now, but the MacBook is a laptop. I am being intentionally
vague about the rest of the specs here to stress the anecdotal and
unscientific nature of this knowledge :-).
However, this result doesn't surprise me, and I guess it may generalize
to the current generation of hardware, which is to say, Intel wins. RAM
is important, as is raw CPU speed, but L2 cache is _the_ major
determinant of Python's performance in all of the cross-machine
profiling I've done. That is to say, this experiment, and this one
other time I think I ran some stuff on a PowerPC or a MIPS or something
(those are different, right?).
Good luck on making the right choice here with such tight constraints!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Twisted-Python