thomas.weholt at gmail.com
Sun Jan 23 16:55:00 EST 2005
Hmmm ... are you saying there's a webdav-package coming in a
soon-to-be-released update of the Twisted-package? Based on akadav or
WabDav is probably the only thing I miss in Twisted. Well, that and
perhaps better ( if it works at all ) support for ICQ.
BTW: Any hint on how to communicate to ICQ-users would be highly interesting.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:38:15 +1100, Timothy Stebbing <tjs at nunatak.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 14:22 +0100, Tim Terlegård wrote:
> > > >Also, IMHO, simpleftpclient.py and simplesshclient.py should differ only
> > > >one or very few lines, the authentication part. Everything else should
> > > >be the same.
> > > >
> > > >Am I making sense? What do you think about this?
> > >
> > > "Yes please".
> > You're saying that VFS is a good idea and that I should implement it?
> > As I'm no twisted guru I'd like some guidance, please. Has this been
> > thought about before? Is something like this considered for 2.0? Are
> > there any difficulties implementing it?
> > Tim
> At some stage this year I'll be implementing a related thing for work,
> most probably given back to twisted; A twisted VFS server, the concept
> will be to provide a simple tree that represents a filesystem, which
> will then be published via webDAV (which we will implement for twisted),
> FTP, sambaVFS etc.. I guess this is the opposite of what your takling
> about, your interested in a client to other existing services.
> The reason I bring this up is that they seem like two halves of the same
> Twisted-Python mailing list
> Twisted-Python at twistedmatrix.com
More information about the Twisted-Python