AW: [Twisted-Python] Lies, Damn Lies, and Stable Interfaces
Martin.Moellenbeck at t-online.de
Mon Jun 16 17:19:39 EDT 2003
I have had a small look to the new package, looks coherent.
But isn't it better to provide a modul (maybe "interfaces.py")
with all interfaces of the package?
Von: twisted-python-admin at twistedmatrix.com
[mailto:twisted-python-admin at twistedmatrix.com] Im Auftrag von Glyph
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Juni 2003 12:29
An: twisted-python at twistedmatrix.com
Betreff: [Twisted-Python] Lies, Damn Lies, and Stable Interfaces
There are some new modules in CVS right now, and I would like some
feedback on them.
The modules in question are a sketch of The Wave of the Future of
authentication in Twisted, A.K.A. "New Cred". A good place to start
looking is sandbox/webhappyrealm.py
Unfortunately, this sets a bad precedent, since old cred was
"semi-stable". However, I think that the break with declared stability
is a small price to pay for the _VASTLY_ improved interfaces which this
package provides. Since not too many people were using the old cred
deeply, and the new interfaces are much smaller, hopefully we can
migrate to the new code as quickly as possible.
Of course, no new Twisted functionality would be complete without a
byzantine new set of terms. In this case, the terms are hopefully more
descriptive and more memorable; as a bonus, they do not conflict with
the old names, so we can keep both versions of cred on-line until such
time as the deprecation warnings can be resolved.
This message is primarily about those new names. I hope that this
provides enough fodder for someone with more time to produce a
nice-looking HOWTO. Without further ado, here are the new words you
need to integrate into your basal nervous system:
This is the ineffable mystery at the core of login. There is one
concrete implementation of Portal, and no interface - it does a very
simple task. A Portal associates one (1) Realm with a collection of
CredentialChecker instances. (More on those later.)
The closest analogue of this in Old Cred was the Authorizer.
If you are writing a protocol that needs to authenticate against
something, you will need a reference to a Portal, and to nothing else.
This has only 2 methods -
login(credentials, mind, *interfaces)
The docstring is quite expansive (see twisted.cred.portal), but in
brief, this is what you call when you need to call in order to connect
a user to the system. The result is a deferred which fires a tuple of:
- interface (which was one of the interfaces passed in the
- an object that implements that interface (an Aspect of an
logout, a 0-argument callable which disconnects the connection that was
established by this call to login
which adds a CredentialChecker to the portal.
Masters of Perspective Broker already know this object as the ill-named
"client object". There is no "mind" class, or even interface, but it
is an object which serves an important role - any notifications which
are to be relayed to an authenticated client are passed through a
The name may seem rather unusual, but considering that a Mind is
representative of the entity on the "other end" of a network connection
that is both receiving updates and issuing commands, I believe it is
Although many protocols will not use this, it serves an important role.
It is provided as an argument both to the Portal and to the Realm,
although a CredentialChecker should interact with a client program
exclusively through a Credentials instance.
Unlike the original Perspective Broker "client object", a Mind's
implementation is most often dictated by the protocol that is
connecting rather than the Realm. A Realm which requires a particular
interface to issue notifications will need to wrap the Protocol's mind
implementation with an adapter in order to get one that conforms to its
expected interface - however, Perspective Broker will likely continue
to use the model where the client object has a pre-specified remote
(If you don't quite understand this, it's fine. It's hard to explain,
and it's not used in simple usages of cred, so feel free to pass None
until you find yourself requiring something like this.)
This is an object which resolves some Credentials to an avatar ID.
Some examples of CredentialChecker implementations would be:
UNIXPasswordDatabase, SSHPublicKeyChecker. A credential checker
stipulates some requirements of the credentials it can check by
specifying a credentialInterfaces attribute, which is a list of
interfaces. Credentials passed to its requestAvatarId method must
implement one of those interfaces.
For the most part, these things will just check usernames and passwords
and produce the username as the result, but hopefully we will be seeing
some public-key, challenge-response, and certificate based credential
checker mechanisms soon. (If somebody were to write an
ActiveDirectory-compatible LDAP login, they would be my best friend for
A credential checker should raise an error if it cannot authenticate
the user, and return '' for anonymous access.
Oddly enough, this represents some credentials that the user presents.
Usually this will just be a small static blob of data, but in some
cases it will actually be an object connected to a network protocol.
For example, a username/password pair is static, but a
challenge/response server is an active state-machine that will require
several method calls in order to determine a result.
A realm is an interface which connects your universe of "business
objects" to the authentication system. This is similar to the Old Cred
"Service", but the name "Service" will be phased out when referring to
cred - another planned refactoring is to move
twisted.internet.app.ApplicationService into its own module and more
heavily emphasize its use in start-up and shut-down.
IRealm is another one-method interface:
requestAvatar(avatarId, mind, *interfaces)
This method will typically be called from 'Portal.login'. The avatarId
is the one returned by a CredentialChecker.
The important thing to realize about this method is that if it is being
called, _the user has already authenticated_. Therefore, if possible,
the Realm should create a new user if one does not already exist
whenever possible. Of course, sometimes this will be impossible
without more information, and that is the case that the interfaces
argument is for.
Some protocols can only accept a fixed set of interfaces. However,
others (most notably PB) can deal with more arbitrary data being
returned. An online game may call Portal.login with:
IServerPlayerInWorld, IUserChooser, ICharacterCreationThing)
This specifies that the client would most prefer a player in the world,
but, failing that, a UserChooser (selection interface for a second step
to get a PlayerInWorld) or a CharacterCreationThing (interface to
create a new character in the world before returning it) would be
Since requestAvatar should be called from a Deferred callback, it may
return a Deferred or a synchronous result.
At the moment, there is only an interface for the Realm. However, it
is expected that a utility class will be written in the near future to
facilitate log-in methods, a re-directing method similar to
"Perspective.attached" for Avatars, and at least somewhat automated
compositing of Realms. However, in writing the code for cred and
guard, there has been no need for such a thing yet.
This object has the dubious distinction of appearing nowhere in the
code; in fact, very few things will ever touch an actual Avatar, and it
is not clear that it will have an interface. However, _aspects_ of an
avatar are returned in deferreds from the above methods, which is to
say, things that implement particular interfaces which communicate with
various protocols that may access your Realm.
This is (hopefully, obviously) similar to a 'Perspective'. However, an
Avatar separates 2 concerns which were muddied previously - _access_ to
a realm and _storage of user data_ within a realm. The avatar itself
stores the data, and the aspects interface to it. The avatar itself
may of course implement its own aspects, but it is suggested in most
cases to register adapters that do this. (Perspective Broker will keep
its name, because the Avatar Aspect that communicates with the remote
object protocol will still be called a Perspective.)
While it's understandable to want to wait for this interface to fully
stabilize, we suggest that you start porting code to it _now_,
especially if you're already tracking CVS. The old cred was, through
the continued efforts of many developers, experimentally determined to
be a piece of crap. I humbly suggest that this interface is not only
not a piece of crap, but totally awesome, and actually usable in real
applications. Not only is it a vastly better design, it makes use of
Deferreds in such a way that it is almost effortless to provide or
manipulate an implementation of one of these interfaces. (As a
yardstick, the code for woven.guard was 30% shorter and the example was
almost unmeasureably shorter - sandbox/webhappyrealm.py is already
doing things that were impossible under the old model.)
I hope this explanation was helpful. Please give feedback.
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python at twistedmatrix.com
More information about the Twisted-Python