[Twisted-Python] Re: [Twisted-commits] Document the likley consequence of non running of unit tests
Glyph Lefkowitz
glyph at twistedmatrix.com
Mon Sep 23 19:16:09 MDT 2002
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:12:09 -0500 (CDT), Glyph Lefkowitz <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:12:51 -0600, Bruce Mitchener <bruce at cubik.org> wrote:
> > It'd be nice to see some further constructive discussion of this. We'll
> > also need to update the coding standard to reflect the usage of epydoc
> > rather than HappyDoc as well. There are probably other updates that
> > could and should be made as well.
>
> I agree. Where is epydoc's pseudo-structured-text format documented? Does the
> existing pipe-prefix convention for inline code samples still work?
Answering my own (stupid) question: I just checked in a small change to the
coding standard to specify epytext and point at its online docs.
--
| <`'> | Glyph Lefkowitz: Traveling Sorcerer |
| < _/ > | Lead Developer, the Twisted project |
| < ___/ > | http://www.twistedmatrix.com |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/twisted-python/attachments/20020923/123a3e51/attachment.sig>
More information about the Twisted-Python
mailing list