[Reality] Wearable computing

[Allen Short]

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_18_05:00:55_2002_457)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>>>>> "Glyph" == Glyph Lefkowitz <glyph@twistedmatrix.com> writes:

    > I think this means that we should have "category objects" which
    > specify factories and invariants for certain constellations of
    > functionality that can be associated with Things, and perhaps
    > for Things themselves, in order that we don't get nonsensible
    > (incompatible) combinations of stuff.  'Electronic + Portable +
    > Clothing = YES' but 'Clothing + Landscape + Explosive = NO'.
    > This may also imply that some adapters are intrinsic but others
    > are extrinsic.  (I *am* a flute, but I just *happen* to be
    > enchanted at the moment.)

i smell a use case for opencyc...
(*flicks on Asbahr-shaped spotlight*)

seriously though, this is moving into the domain of knowledge bases
and probably should be treated as such, whether you use cyc or framerd
or whatever. at the least, some sort of storage of relationships apart
from the relationships of the code would help.

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_18_05:00:55_2002_457)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9iE7ZEd6n5DRBYM4RAsC0AJ0bk8PyXrfyEve8unITy8hkr7DdxgCcCWeU
QZceVBQ/UsAXGYrNFfxJAY0=
=9IjJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_18_05:00:55_2002_457)----